One less show to watch, for now - I've given up on Hawaii 5-0.
I was fairly accepting of the deficiencies in story for the first couple of episodes, wanting to give the show some time to find its feet. What finally cut it for me was the episode involving the shooting death of a surfing company exec. The shooting took place from an area where there were no roads. How to get there? Cut to a scene of McGarrett and Chin blazing through the jungle on dirt bikes. Then cut back to the office for a couple minutes, then back to the jungle. Why? Just to have the action sequence, it appears.
In the balance this isn't the most egregious sin a show could commit, but it underscored the growing feeling I had that there was nothing compelling to bring me back every week. The over-arching story of police corruption that innvolved McGarrett's dad and his Tool Box of Clues, which seemed poised to give some added weight to the show, had pretty much ground to a halt as well. The last we saw of this story was McGarrett's ne'er-do-well sister putting the evidence on her phone. If she could get her hands on this information, I have a hard time believing that one of the cops involved in the plot hasn't managed to steal the box and throw it in the ocean by now.
I will happily chug along with Detroit 1-8-7, which at least tries to be compelling.
Showing posts with label Hawaii 5-0. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hawaii 5-0. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 03, 2010
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
New on TV: Hawaii 5-0 and Detroit 1-8-7
So these are the two new hour-long shows I've started watching, though neither is exactly new.
Hawaii 5-0 is an update of the original rather than a continuation. The basic premise is the same: Steve McGarrett leads a special unit of the Hawaiian state police, though this time the group's charge is a bit more nebulous, allowing them to venture into cases that touch upon national security and terrorism. I see how this allows the show more freedom with plots, but it also opens the door for this to become a 24-lite, and who wants that?
One notable difference between the original and the remake is that the newer show delves much more deeply into characters and their back-stories. McGarrett is a Naval intelligence office who agreed to head up 5-0 to catch the man who killed his father (and inherited an apparent investigation into police corruption). Danny Williams is a divorced dad who moved to Hawaii to be near his daughter. Chin Ho left the Honolulu PD under suspicion of stealing money from crime scenes, and his cousin, Kono, is a brand new officer (and, in this case, a woman).
I do like that there's more personal involvement with the characters, and that we get to see them grow as a unit. I'm less happy with the way the show handled bringing over some of the conventions of the old series (less so with the explanation of the nickname Dan-o, more so over how the team got the 5-0 name, which is kind of ridiculous). I'm most happy that the original theme survived, even if in cut-down form.
And if I'm going to nitpick, I'd like to complain that (a) there's not enough location shooting with the principal characters; most of what we see of Hawaii is B-roll, and (b) the effects used to simulate driving when McGarrett and Danny talk in the car are awful.
There's nothing special to point out about the acting. Scott Caan stands out as much as anyone does for his portrayal of Danny. I expect Daniel Dae Kim is missing the Lost writers about now, and Grace Park is surprisingly life-like. Alex O'Loughlin is inoffensively generic as McGarrett, running at about 75 percent of Jack Lord.
The new Hawaii 5-0 isn't perfect, but it's enough of a change from the cookie cutter procedurals to make it watchable, and with the location in the title we're less likely to get a spinoff like Hawaii 5-0: Phoenix.
Detroit 1-8-7 is a new show, but I liked it better when it was set in Baltimore and called Homicide: Life on the Street. It's hard not to compare when you have two shows set among the murder police of a decaying American city, and at best you can say that Detroit 1-8-7 doesn't force Jon Seda on an unwitting public.
Michael Imperioli plays Louis Fitch, a New York transplant who is kind of quirky and is having issues breaking in a new partner (hello Frank Pembleton). His partner, Damon Washington, is newly transferred into homicide, and at the end of their first case he's shot when the suspect gets a gun out of a police officer's holster (hello, Junior Bunk). The other pairs include a veteran closing in on retirement (part Bolander, part Giardello as he's an African-American who speaks Italian) and, in what might be a first, a partner of Indian descent, and a young female detective whose a Detroit native (part Lewis, part a much more competent Ballard) who is partnered with a new transfer from narcotics. There's some involvement with their commanding lieutenant and an assistant DA (Giardello and Danvers, respectively).
There's nothing about Detroit 1-8-7(except maybe the music) that's up to Homicide's level, but that's a pretty high bar to clear. It's at least as good as its contemporaries, and scores points for not being set in New York or Los Angeles. It's not pulling in Hawaii 5-0's ratings, but I think Detroit 1-8-7 is the better show. Stupid name notwithstanding.
Hawaii 5-0 is an update of the original rather than a continuation. The basic premise is the same: Steve McGarrett leads a special unit of the Hawaiian state police, though this time the group's charge is a bit more nebulous, allowing them to venture into cases that touch upon national security and terrorism. I see how this allows the show more freedom with plots, but it also opens the door for this to become a 24-lite, and who wants that?
One notable difference between the original and the remake is that the newer show delves much more deeply into characters and their back-stories. McGarrett is a Naval intelligence office who agreed to head up 5-0 to catch the man who killed his father (and inherited an apparent investigation into police corruption). Danny Williams is a divorced dad who moved to Hawaii to be near his daughter. Chin Ho left the Honolulu PD under suspicion of stealing money from crime scenes, and his cousin, Kono, is a brand new officer (and, in this case, a woman).
I do like that there's more personal involvement with the characters, and that we get to see them grow as a unit. I'm less happy with the way the show handled bringing over some of the conventions of the old series (less so with the explanation of the nickname Dan-o, more so over how the team got the 5-0 name, which is kind of ridiculous). I'm most happy that the original theme survived, even if in cut-down form.
And if I'm going to nitpick, I'd like to complain that (a) there's not enough location shooting with the principal characters; most of what we see of Hawaii is B-roll, and (b) the effects used to simulate driving when McGarrett and Danny talk in the car are awful.
There's nothing special to point out about the acting. Scott Caan stands out as much as anyone does for his portrayal of Danny. I expect Daniel Dae Kim is missing the Lost writers about now, and Grace Park is surprisingly life-like. Alex O'Loughlin is inoffensively generic as McGarrett, running at about 75 percent of Jack Lord.
The new Hawaii 5-0 isn't perfect, but it's enough of a change from the cookie cutter procedurals to make it watchable, and with the location in the title we're less likely to get a spinoff like Hawaii 5-0: Phoenix.
Detroit 1-8-7 is a new show, but I liked it better when it was set in Baltimore and called Homicide: Life on the Street. It's hard not to compare when you have two shows set among the murder police of a decaying American city, and at best you can say that Detroit 1-8-7 doesn't force Jon Seda on an unwitting public.
Michael Imperioli plays Louis Fitch, a New York transplant who is kind of quirky and is having issues breaking in a new partner (hello Frank Pembleton). His partner, Damon Washington, is newly transferred into homicide, and at the end of their first case he's shot when the suspect gets a gun out of a police officer's holster (hello, Junior Bunk). The other pairs include a veteran closing in on retirement (part Bolander, part Giardello as he's an African-American who speaks Italian) and, in what might be a first, a partner of Indian descent, and a young female detective whose a Detroit native (part Lewis, part a much more competent Ballard) who is partnered with a new transfer from narcotics. There's some involvement with their commanding lieutenant and an assistant DA (Giardello and Danvers, respectively).
There's nothing about Detroit 1-8-7(except maybe the music) that's up to Homicide's level, but that's a pretty high bar to clear. It's at least as good as its contemporaries, and scores points for not being set in New York or Los Angeles. It's not pulling in Hawaii 5-0's ratings, but I think Detroit 1-8-7 is the better show. Stupid name notwithstanding.
Friday, September 24, 2010
New on TV: Hawaii 5-0 and Undercovers
It's premature to judge a series based on its pilot. As it's the episode made specifically to sell the series, you can have a ton of exposition that sets up the episodes to follow, or a lot of flash to get viewers hooked. This week, I've seen one pilot for each of these.
Hawaii 5-0 is the expositional one, as the hour delved into the creation of the 5-0 team and set up the back stories for each of the characters while trying to solve the murder of Navy officer Steve McGarrett's father. I didn't expect quite so much background from a series revival, but I think it was done because(a) current viewers under 40 have likely never seen an episode of the original, and (b) to differentiate the new version from the old for those of us who have seen it.
Getting past all of the set-up, the pilot did have a fair amount of action and more violence than expected, which I suppose gives the show a push towards the spectacle area. This, as well as the broad charge the governor of Hawaii (played by Jean Smart) gives McGarrett, makes me fear that this will be less a cop show and more a tropical riff on 24. Even so, I'm still going to give it a chance, and based on the ratings (the pilot won its time slot, and will likely be the most-watched new show of the first week), I'm not alone. Maybe we're all just happy they didn't mess with the theme song all that much.
Undercovers falls more squarely in the latter category. A married pair of retired spies is goaded back into service by a CIA handler (Gerald McRainey) to find a former colleague who has gone missing. In the course of the hour, the newly reinstated spies travel to three countries, con their way into a bank to see ATM camera footage, crash a wedding to steal information off of a cell phone, skydive, get involved in a rooftop fight and handle crises related to a wedding reception (the pair entered catering after leaving the Company). It's slickly done, has attractive leads with good chemistry, and promises a dashing mix of spy work and domestic semi-tranquility.
And yet I do not plan to watch it again. I just never quite engaged with the show. It was too light to take seriously, and just a bit too serious to completely lose any expectation of reality. When someone who devotedly watched Lost through all of the time travel, glowing island hearts and polar bears starts to think that a show is implausible, you may have a problem.
I'll also admit to feeling like I'm going to get burned again. The pilot to Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip was also energetic, featured attractive leads with good chemistry, and moved at a pace that made an hour seem like it was five minutes. And then the whole thing caved in on itself and got cancelled. One bitten twice shy, I suppose. I'll happily wait for whatever JJ Abrahms has cooked up for Michael Emerson and Terry O'Quinn.
Hawaii 5-0 is the expositional one, as the hour delved into the creation of the 5-0 team and set up the back stories for each of the characters while trying to solve the murder of Navy officer Steve McGarrett's father. I didn't expect quite so much background from a series revival, but I think it was done because(a) current viewers under 40 have likely never seen an episode of the original, and (b) to differentiate the new version from the old for those of us who have seen it.
Getting past all of the set-up, the pilot did have a fair amount of action and more violence than expected, which I suppose gives the show a push towards the spectacle area. This, as well as the broad charge the governor of Hawaii (played by Jean Smart) gives McGarrett, makes me fear that this will be less a cop show and more a tropical riff on 24. Even so, I'm still going to give it a chance, and based on the ratings (the pilot won its time slot, and will likely be the most-watched new show of the first week), I'm not alone. Maybe we're all just happy they didn't mess with the theme song all that much.
Undercovers falls more squarely in the latter category. A married pair of retired spies is goaded back into service by a CIA handler (Gerald McRainey) to find a former colleague who has gone missing. In the course of the hour, the newly reinstated spies travel to three countries, con their way into a bank to see ATM camera footage, crash a wedding to steal information off of a cell phone, skydive, get involved in a rooftop fight and handle crises related to a wedding reception (the pair entered catering after leaving the Company). It's slickly done, has attractive leads with good chemistry, and promises a dashing mix of spy work and domestic semi-tranquility.
And yet I do not plan to watch it again. I just never quite engaged with the show. It was too light to take seriously, and just a bit too serious to completely lose any expectation of reality. When someone who devotedly watched Lost through all of the time travel, glowing island hearts and polar bears starts to think that a show is implausible, you may have a problem.
I'll also admit to feeling like I'm going to get burned again. The pilot to Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip was also energetic, featured attractive leads with good chemistry, and moved at a pace that made an hour seem like it was five minutes. And then the whole thing caved in on itself and got cancelled. One bitten twice shy, I suppose. I'll happily wait for whatever JJ Abrahms has cooked up for Michael Emerson and Terry O'Quinn.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)